Pearl Crescent butterfly...
![Pearl Crescent 1 sm.jpg Pearl Crescent 1 sm.jpg](https://cdn2.imagearchive.com/flooringforum/data/attach/20/20151-Pearl-Crescent-1-sm.jpg)
Us older people shouldn't fall like that, bones beecome brittle and we bruise easily especially if on blood thinners. Just saying.
With digital, can you do selective focus or depth of field adjustments after the fact.
There are cheaper optionsCan you get these on Amazon?![]()
![]()
![]()
One of the updates that Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop added about a year ago now is the ability to add blur and "bokeh" to a background. With that feature you can set at what depth of field you want the blur to occur. However, I rarely use it. It can be a bit finicky, and it doesn't always get the masking between the background and the subject correct. I have several faster (f/1.4 to f/2.8) lenses and when you shoot them wide open, that's what obliterates the background like in the butterfly and the woodland sunflower image. Both of those shots were taken with my Nikon D810 and Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6 lens at about 15'-20' distance. Same thing happens there, and you get a lot of compression in the background. I've got an AF (full frame) Nikon 12-35mm f/2.8, Nikon AF 24-70mm f/2.8, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8, 200-500mm f/5.6, 50mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.8, and a 105mm f/2.8. All of those lenses, when shot at their largest aperture blow out the background and separate the subject instead of doing it in post (editing).With digital, can you do selective focus or depth of field adjustments after the fact.