My thoughts on the armchair analysis and what acceptance of the situation provides is De-escalation. If you have the suspect contained were the risk of injury to self and public is somewhat neutralized then you can act with improved skill.
Discussing politics and religion
- Thread starter Floorist
- Start date
Help Support Flooring Forum:
Honestly, I would toss in maturity as the most beneficial weapon a cop could use.
At that period in time, he could not get a fair trial.
That’s why public servants need to
be absolved from public juries….. The second improvement would be public officials able to take over the media airwaves free of charge to inform the public of boundaries around protest. This way they could provide appropriate information about the case that hopefully would give the general public more understanding around the circumstances, in the hopes that the protests remain peaceful. We can’t rely on public media to meet societies needs, because they benefit financially by enhancing the conflict
Our cities would always grant us immunity when testifying. This stopped the cops from being concerned with litigation if they were found to have done something different than exactly by the books. With one of my trials, our city attorney said he would no longer grant us immunity. We politely told him that if they mentioned had we had better training, would there be a different outcome? Once he saw the error in his judgement, he reversed his decision quick.
In a nutshell:
