It probably wouldn't have been any better with Romney as president. When he was governor they had a huge flood. A bipartisan legislature passed a bill to help and Romney vetoed it.
Isn't this the point where the president and FEMA step in and make an executive decision and override this because of the immediate need for help?
I watched as POTUS said to override any red tape to get things done.
If it were Romney he would have states and the private sector pay and take care of these. Yea, I can see states paying for 50 billion dollars worth of damage. And the private sector ponying up that much money, ferget it.
Lets see, in the whole NYC and surrounding area there are 18 plus million people. If 10 percent of them need help thats what....1.8 million plus?
No one can have enough people sitting on the sidelines waiting for something of this magnitude to happen and fix them in a couple days. This is worse than Katrina in New Orleans.
The subways and infrastructure is not even close to being built to withstand anything close to this kinda hurricane.
Ay, it's just a fluke storm and global warming has nothing to do with it.
highup said:Try to tell that to the chemtrail worshipers and the tinfoil hat people.
And here comes a low pressure system to give them some more life giving rain.
Theres only so much a limited number of people can do to help. You'd think the surrounding states would contribute. They probably are but also are limited with funding like everyone else these days.
Next time some politician wants to cut funding for 1st responders and teachers, you better think twice about how your going to vote, least your call for help may fall on deaf ears.
Ask The Don how much he is going to donate.
I'm neither and I believe there is a climate change. I lived in that area for 34 years and in that time I never recall it reaching 100 degrees. It does now at least once every summer. This year was sandy, last year was Irene and the previous winter was one of the worst on record. Something's going on.
And here comes a low pressure system to give them some more life giving rain.
Theres only so much a limited number of people can do to help. You'd think the surrounding states would contribute. They probably are but also are limited with funding like everyone else these days.
Next time some politician wants to cut funding for 1st responders and teachers, you better think twice about how your going to vote, least your call for help may fall on deaf ears.
Ask The Don how much he is going to donate.
Of course it can...I'm not interested in life on the planet, just my life and 34 years is 50% of it. Two hurricanes in two years is far above average.highup said:Something is going on............ it's called average. Climate cannot be averaged over 34 years.
Of course it can...I'm not interested in life on the planet, just my life and 34 years is 50% of it. Two hurricanes in two years is far above average.
Everyone was blaming the extreme heat we have had the last two years on climate change. Only problem is, the same thing happened 30 years ago and 30 years before that and 30 years before that etc. It is a cycle.
Scroll on down mid page for lists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlantic_hurricane_records
One could easily argue more intense, largest in diameter, costliest and most including largest in catagory have all happened after the year 2000.
when we have resolved the scientific debate on climate change about about a discussion on M-theory?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory
I've watched a few shows about that on PBS. It is a little over my head.
But notice every time high posts a list of hurricane info all the pertinent information about the last ten years is missing. Heh heh
I think we can contribute the lack of tornado's in floorists neighborhood to the drought lately. I see a pattern there as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tornado-counts-1976-2011.png
Enter your email address to join: