Then you are out of touch.I’m ok about understanding some economic fluctuations between Presidents and even constitutional weakening, BUT ! ruined and destroy ? No, I’m not buying any of that
(imho )exaggeration.
Then you are out of touch.I’m ok about understanding some economic fluctuations between Presidents and even constitutional weakening, BUT ! ruined and destroy ? No, I’m not buying any of that
(imho )exaggeration.
Then you are out of touch.
The Demos are trying to end gun rights, free speech, do away with the police, let men ruin women's sports and much more.At first glance, I didn’t even see him / her/ who cares because I’m staying in my business ( EYES ON THE REAL DEAL
Maybe I’m out of touch, however IMHO, when we are so sure of ourselves and the evidence we see around us, that’s the time to rethink and reconsider.
Let’s face the truth! Guns don’t kill, people do, so how do we keep the guns out of the hands of people who kill ? THAT’s the purpose ! Listen to the purpose and then maybe we can negotiate progressThe Demos are trying to end gun rights, free speech, do away with the police, let men ruin women's sports and much more.
I believe in the Constitution. Very few guns obtained legally are used in crimes. Most criminals are repeat offenders. Have a mandatory sentence of 20 years if a gun is used in a crime.Let’s face the truth! Guns don’t kill, people do, so how do we keep the guns out of the hands of people who kill ? THAT’s the purpose ! Listen to the purpose and then maybe we can negotiate progress
I believe in constitutional amendments when necessary and anyone under 100 years of age, purchasing a gun for the first time, with no affiliation to the NRA OR GUN CLUB SPONSOR IS An AUTOMATIC RED FLAG ….. if any nra member is against that request to help mitigate a higher percentage of risk, SHAME ON YOU AND THE JACK *** YOU ROAD IN ON, because it will not effect your constitutional right one iota. You may have to pay a little more for the gun, but ! If it was me ! I would make the Insurance companies share the expense. Less risk Equals less claimsI believe in the Constitution
I agree 100 percent !mandatory sentence of 20 years if a gun is used in a crime.
The Demos are trying to end gun rights, free speech, do away with the police, let men ruin women's sports and much more.
You will NOT take my gun rights, period. NRA members are never involved in gun crime. Look it up. The NRA wrote the 4473, the form you must pass to buy a gun. It is a felony to lie on the form. Out of the first 11,000 caught lying on the form, they prosecuted 11. We don't need new gun laws. There are 10,000 gun laws on the books. Enforce those.I believe in constitutional amendments when necessary and anyone under 100 years of age, purchasing a gun for the first time, with no affiliation to the NRA OR GUN CLUB SPONSOR IS An AUTOMATIC RED FLAG ….. if any nra member is against that request to help mitigate a higher percentage of risk, SHAME ON YOU AND THE JACK *** YOU ROAD IN ON, because it will not effect your constitutional right one iota. You may have to pay a little more for the gun, but ! If it was me ! I would make the Insurance companies share the expense. Less risk Equals less claims
As long as the purpose doesn't include more gun laws/limits.......Let’s face the truth! Guns don’t kill, people do, so how do we keep the guns out of the hands of people who kill ? THAT’s the purpose ! Listen to the purpose and then maybe we can negotiate progress
I'd agree that inflation has very different consequences for different types of Americans. Some do well when the stock market and real estate values explode upward offsetting their rising cost of living----two HUGE indicators of inflation that are not included as inflation the way it's measured????? When I look at the chart of the Dow or S&P I see inflation. But that doesn't count..I’m ok about understanding some economic fluctuations between Presidents and even constitutional weakening, BUT ! ruined and destroy ? No, I’m not buying any of that
(imho )exaggeration.
If you had to name one President from each Party, that demonstrated Constitutional Integrity, within the past 50 years or so, who would you pick ?Culturally, as well it's hard to disagree that there's ongoing destruction and ruination of the most basic elements of our shared Western civilization. As far as the Constitution I wonder if those in political power ever had much sincere regard for it's integrity.
So the question would require us to have presidents who put the Constitutional principles above the interests of their owners-----(global corporations and financial conglomerates)If you had to name one President from each Party, that demonstrated Constitutional Integrity, within the past 50 years or so, who would you pick ?
Thanks, I was gonna say Reagan.So the question would require us to have presidents who put the Constitutional principles above the interests of their owners-----(global corporations and financial conglomerates)
No such creature exists in recent US history, if there ever were one.
It is easier to pick the most dishonest. Obama/Biden And Dubya.
Enter your email address to join: